I think the strikes and demonstrations against the government are a symptom that something is wrong.
I'm talking in general sense, eh.
The statement that I will discuss is this:
"who protest in the streets not recognize the legitimacy 'of parliament."
No? Think about it a bit '. We are ten people and we must elect a leader. A bracket football, union representative, the organizer of a party with friends or whatever.
Initially we agree on HOW to elect the head, right? With the votes? Do so. And we all agree. After the vote, who did not vote for the winner begins to wail and rowing against.
look right? What's wrong?
The error is that if you vote for the parliament, then you must obey the laws that parliament and not emit row against. And if you do not vote, it means that you are ready to accept any government should be in power. In any case, you should not demonstrate against the government and parliament, since they are elected by all.
Or we might consider a change in the way we elect our representatives. For example, in the parliament there are only the parties and there are no trade unions and associations.
Verissimo. The parties are an opinion, "aggregate" of voters. In reality, a voter può essere di sinistra per quanto riguarda l'economia e di destra per quanto riguarda la sicurezza nei quartieri.
Una delle due camere potrebbe essere benissimo eletta senza partiti, contenente solo i sindacati e altre categorie.
Sarei proprio curioso di vedere i sindacati in piazza a manifestare contro una legge che essi stessi hanno votato in parlamento...
cambiamento...
0 comments:
Post a Comment