Play Pokemon Gold Online

Strikes and demonstrations

I think the strikes and demonstrations against the government are a symptom that something is wrong.
I'm talking in general sense, eh.
The statement that I will discuss is this:

"who protest in the streets not recognize the legitimacy 'of parliament."

No? Think about it a bit '. We are ten people and we must elect a leader. A bracket football, union representative, the organizer of a party with friends or whatever.
Initially we agree on HOW to elect the head, right? With the votes? Do so. And we all agree. After the vote, who did not vote for the winner begins to wail and rowing against.
look right? What's wrong?

The error is that if you vote for the parliament, then you must obey the laws that parliament and not emit row against. And if you do not vote, it means that you are ready to accept any government should be in power. In any case, you should not demonstrate against the government and parliament, since they are elected by all.

Or we might consider a change in the way we elect our representatives. For example, in the parliament there are only the parties and there are no trade unions and associations.
Verissimo. The parties are an opinion, "aggregate" of voters. In reality, a voter può essere di sinistra per quanto riguarda l'economia e di destra per quanto riguarda la sicurezza nei quartieri.
Una delle due camere potrebbe essere benissimo eletta senza partiti, contenente solo i sindacati e altre categorie.

Sarei proprio curioso di vedere i sindacati in piazza a manifestare contro una legge che essi stessi hanno votato in parlamento...

cambiamento...

Milk With Honey Insomnia

Electoral System 2 / 2 The

Va ben, ci avete pensato abbastanza.
Elencherò adesso alcuni punti e poi la soluzione.
No, meglio. Farò il contrario. Prima la soluzione e poi le osservazioni.

Camera numero 1 (ad esempio la Camera dei Deputati)
Liste a livello nazionale. Sistema proporzionale con sbarramento al 4% and 55-60% of the seats allocated to the winning party. The victorious party is designated by two rounds, with runoff between the two major parties resulting from the first round.
Note for the future: I think a system where the ballot should take place in the top three parties, obviously under some conditions. I will talk about later.

Room number 2 (eg the Senate)
Listings at regional level. Two-round election. In the second round are presented in the first round of the parties that have obtained at least 10% of the votes at a regional level. Here, we proceed to an election by single-member plurality system. E 'Approval for withdrawal between the parties. In practice, the first round is required to obtain permission to go to second.

Comments:
-system simplifies the political landscape through the dams
double-shift operation guarantees the emergence of new parties as there is evidence (to be a better person myself) that the first round of voting is a vote sincere and not tactical.
-majority of 60% in the two chambers have the advantage of transforming the system into a unicameral parliament, "de facto", as each debate takes place in the Senate, as is the majority party in the room to dictate the terms
-majority of 60% in one of the two rooms is an anti-reversal mechanism "de facto", as every government must have the vote of confidence both chambers of the Senate
-system could lead to such a situation in which some regions have all the senators of the same party-
Senate are rewarded with the system of those regional parties that are both large (chosen with the first round) , local (regional lists are) and disseminated (thanks to the majority of the second round)

compensatory measures that originally wanted to apply the system to the room of the Senate also ... But the system described here certainly has more benefits.

There's only one thing missing, which I'm thinking a bit 'of time.

de facto ...

Good News Message Examples

school Italy

Have you ever wondered why the school system in Italy sucks?

Try to make a survey of students: those who, between them, not like going to school? And those who give them up willingly?
threw out a hypothetical result: 80 percent. These guys

80%, gentlemen, when they vote for 18 years. And what do you vote? Harder for a school? Severa? But of course, quite the opposite! In Italy there is a party that has no name but which is worth 80% of the votes: the party who is wrong at school, the school hate it, burn it all, which would put the stake of the first class and those who come out with top marks.

And someone has the courage to ask why those who break the ass to school, agrees, is the rules and leaves with the highest score after graduation and above, can not find a suitable job! But what is adequate? People want the opposite! The vote of an ignorant bastard and sea all the lessons (in my part are said to "burn") and can not even take a pass counts as one who excels in all subjects!
It 'clear that the bastard wants, wants, He wants those who study both penalized. He wants someone with a qualification to be shot! Other than at work!

This is the truth, my friends. The vote of a fool is as good as that of a genius.

I will tell you also that in the Italian constitution is scritto che tutti hanno diritto a votare. Non è specificato che, un giorno, le cose non possano cambiare in meglio: e cioè che il voto del genio valga VENTI VOLTE quello di uno stupido...

adeguato...

Fetus Enlarged Left Kidney

Heels


Lo so, lo so. Questo dovrebbe essere un blog serio.
Ma è anche vero che lo gestisco io e che ci posso scrivere tutto quel cacchio che voglio.
Come si fa a non rimanere incantati da una scena così?
Una donna in autoreggenti e tacchi alti mi può chiedere quello che vuole...

serio...